
This morning ACC Technical Director Ken McAlpine (AUS) informed the teams via email that he has allocated sail number 94, meaning that another team has commenced construction of a new yacht.
The Technical Director only reports numbers allocated, not to which team.
What is auspicious about number 94? Of course it is the atomic number for plutonium, the radiological poison specifically absorbed by bone marrow, a highly fissionable isotope of which (Pu 239) is used as a reactor fuel and in nuclear weapons. We note, too, that it was the number of Haydn's famous "Surprise Symphony" (
Symphony No. 94).
Interesting that the last sail number was issued way back on 10 July. Updating our
post from that day when 93 was issued....
With new sail numbers expected to be allocated regularly for the next weeks given the time it takes most teams to build and ship a new yacht to Valencia, we thought our readers might appreciate a quick review of the ACC sail numbers issued since the end of the 2003 Cup:
RSA 83 -- Shosholoza, launched early 2005.
NZL 84 -- Emirates Team NZ, launched late 2005.
ITA 85 -- Plus 39, in Valencia being fitted out, expected sailing shortly.
ITA 86 -- Luna Rossa, launched in Q2 of 2006, raced in Acts 10-12.
USA 87 -- BMW ORACLE Racing, launched in Q2 of 2006, raced in Acts 10-12.
ESP 88 -- Desafio Espanol, launched in Q2 of 2006, raced in Act 12.
GER 89 -- United Internet Team Germany, now sailing in Valencia.
ITA 90 -- Mascalzone Latino Capitalia Team, launched in Q2 and sailing in VLC, not raced.
SUI 91 -- Alinghi, launched in Q2 and sailing in VLC, not raced.
NZL 92 -- Emirates Team New Zealand, will be launched and sailing in NZL in November.
FRA 93 -- Areva Challenge, allocated 10 July with launch date announced as sometime in November.
94 -- allocated today.
Teams may build a maximum of two new yachts during AC 32. From media and other reports, additional new yachts expected before the end of AC 32:
CHN -- first (only) new yacht.
ESP -- second new yacht.
SWE -- first (only?) new yacht.
ITA/LR -- second.
ITA/MLC -- second.
USA -- second.
SUI -- second.
Presumably 94 has been allocated to one of the seven yachts projected above -- indeed, this morning here in Valencia the speculation is that it belongs to China Team as some weeks ago they announced the completion of their hull mould. So six more numbers to come during AC 32? That would give us an even 100 before the end of AC 32.
Inasmuch as the Challengers have to be ready for the start of the LVC in the middle of April next year, and whereas the Defender has until the start of the AC Match on 23 June, assuming we do get to 100 will it belong to Alinghi?
If, however, Sweden's Victory Challenge builds a second yacht (as some are suggesting might be the case), the last yacht for AC 32 could be 101. All this again begs the question whether the ACC class will be used for AC 33, or will 100 or 101 be the end of the line for the class that has served the Cup so well since 1992?
Finally, in our 10 July post we asked a somewhat tricky Cup trivia question: Since he began doing so in 1990, which
two numbers were not allocated by the Technical Director in sequence as required under the ACC Rule?
The answer, we are told by authoritative technical and historical sources, is that:
+
13 was never issued due to the superstition in many Christian cultures that 13 is bad luck (arising, apparently, from the number of attendees at the "Last Supper") -- same as many buildings do not have a 13th floor and airliners no 13th row. Indeed, next April's Act 13 (the "Fleet Race Regatta") was originally designated by ACM as Act 14 for the same reason; and
+
69 initially was not allocated by the Technical Director for reasons that are not entirely clear; however, after 70 and 71 had been issued to other teams, the AC 31 French team Le Defi said that they liked 69 and asked that the number be issued to them despite it having been skipped.
ACC Technical Director, and arbiter of
good taste in sail numbers, Ken McAlpine.
(Photo courtesy of ACM.)